ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES AS PART OF INVESTMENT IN THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY SECTOR UNDER INDONESIAN LAW

Main Article Content

Dr. Ranti Fauza Mayana Tanwir S. H., M. H.
Daniel Hendrawan, S. H., M. Hum., M.Kn.

Keywords

Investment, copyright, alternative dispute resolution, intellectual property, industry

Abstract

Purpose: The amount of investment in Indonesia both foreign and domestic increases in number each year. One of the growing investment in Indonesia is the creative industry. Creativity from this creative industry produces a variety of works protected by intellectual property. The development of intellectual property law advanced rapidly. One form of intellectual property is copyright. The many interests in the implementation of this copyright cause some problems and disputes. Indonesia itself recognizes some non-court settlement disputes namely arbitration and mediation so that intellectual property may remain protected.


Methodology: This research study gathered secondary data from literature review, online article, dialogues and different document available on the internet regarding the copyright law. In addition, this research study has analysed different Indonesian law regarding copyright.


Main Findings: There are rights in copyright protected by law. In-Law No. 28 of 2014 it is possible to settle disputes outside the court through several methods. Article 95 of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright stipulates that Settlement of Copyright disputes may be made through alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, or courts.


Implications/Applications: The findings of the study are helpful in gaining knowledge regarding law available regarding copyright and settlement of Copyright disputes through alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, or courts, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 57 | PDF Downloads 56 XML Downloads 1 ePUB Downloads 1

References

1. Ambikai., & Ishan, Z. (2016). Comparative analysis of law on tort of deviant behaviors in Malaysia and India. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(4), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.4.5
2. Boniface, A. E. (2016). Animals: ‘Objects’ or ‘sentient beings’? A comparative perspective of the South African law. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.3.3
3. Djilali, B., Sarra, B., & Abdesselem, B. (2016). Proposal of a new model for the Algerian companies to measure the effect of intellectual capital on organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 2(5), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.2.10003-5
4. Frans, H. W. (2011). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa-Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia & Internasional. Jakarta, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika Offset.
5. Gatot, S. (2010). Hak Cipta dan Aspek-Aspek Hukumnya. Jakarta, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.
6. Ibo, A. (2018). Asia Young Designer Award Dorong Perkembangan Industri Kreatif. Retr
7. Hairudinor, Barkatullah, A. H., Utomo, S., and Jirhanuddin. (2017). Potential Investment Analysis: A Case Study at Kotabaru Regency, Province of South Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 2(5), 276-287ieved from https://bit.ly/2JDjIQ6, https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2017-25002
8. Halim, N. H. A., Adnan, A. N., & Khusaini, N. S. (2017). Kaizen event assessment through performance and economic investment analysis. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.3.10001-1
9. Jimmy, J. S. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan (Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi, & Arbitrase). Jakarta, Indonesia: Visimedia.
10. Kapindha, R. A. A., Dwi M, S., & Febrina, W. R. (2014). Efektivitas Dan Efisiensi Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Sebagai Salah Satu Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia. Privat Law 1, 2(4).
11. Lestarini, A. H. (2018). Akan Jadi Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kreatif. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/32AmJIy
12. Munir, F. (2003). Arbitrase Nasional (Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis). Bandung, Indonesia: Citra Aditya Bakti.
13. Madani, S. (2017). Economic evaluation of investment for oceanographic research by using cost benefit analysis (A case study of Iranian National Institute for Oceanography). International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 2(2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2017-22001
14. Muryati, D. T., & Heryanti, B. R. (2011). Pengaturan dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Nonlitigasi di Bidang Perdagangan. Jurnal Dinamika Sosbud, 3(1), 49-65.
15. Putri, Y. R. (2015). Transformational leadership and its impact to lecturers intellectual Capital Factors in Telkom economics and business school Telkom University. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 1(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.10006
16. Rachmadi, U. (2003). Hukum HAKI: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya. Bandung, Indonesia: Alumni.
17. Saidin, (2004). Aspek Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Right). Jakarta, Indonesia: Rajawali Pers.
18. Suyud, M. (2004). ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) & Arbitrase:Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum. Bogor, Indonesia: Ghalia Indonesia.
19. Syafrinaldi, (2010). Hukum Tentang Perlindungan Hak Milik Intelektual Dalam Menghadapi Era Globalisasi. Jakarta, Indonesia.
20. Yetty, W. C. (2013). Penyuluhan dan Konsultasi. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2XTkLnV