Main Article Content
Compromise, Social status motives, Economic motives, Rambu solo’, Indonesia
Purpose of the study: The rambu solo’ ceremony is a traditional death ceremony of the Tana Toraja regency with roots in local beliefs. However, over time, the tradition has become associated with social status and economic motives. These changes have led to many issues. This article analyses the motivations that drive the compromises that families must accept when selecting a form of rambu solo’.
Methodology: This was a case study conducted in the village of Lemo in the regency of Tana Toraja. Primary data collected through in-depth interviews and observation. Informants consisted of cultural figures, religious figures, and indigenous locals with experience performing rambu solo’ — secondary data taken from existing literature about Toraja Regency.
Main Findings: Results showed that compromises taken for motives of social status were irrational but comprised the most common reasoning behind rambu solo’ ceremony selection. For those families motivated by social status, choice of rambu solo’ ceremony form performed for one of two reasons: preserving their social status ascribed to them from birth (attributed status)
Applications of this study: The selection of non-rapasanrambu solo’ ceremonies based on economic motives were rationally-sound but relatively rare. Avoiding wastefulness in the performing of rambu solo’ is done through simplifying the procession through shortening the storage period of the remains of the deceased before the rambu solo’ reducing the number of days of the rambu solo’ ceremony.
Novelty/Originality of this study: This shows that irrational decision-making, in the context of traditional ceremonies, cannot be considered irrational; even irrational decisions can be justified and explained based on individual interpretations of rationality based on local culture. Interestingly, social status was the most common motive form selection based on economic motives were rational but less popular among the people sound choice theory
2. Baloyi, M. E. (2014). Distance no Impediment for Funerals: Death as a Uniting Ritual for African People – A Pastoral Study. Verbum et Ecclesia, 35(1), 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script= sci_abstract&pid=S2074-77052014000100025&lng=en&nrm=iso. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v35i1.1248
3. Coleman, J. S. (1994). Fundations of Social Theory. Cambridge. Retrieved from https://www.hup.harvard.e du/catalog.php?isbn=9780674312265
4. Gani, M., Arsyad, Hadi, H., & Yusriadi. (2019). Success in Management of Student Businesses with Personal Characteristics, Government Assistance and Entrepreneurship Curriculum. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3), 792–795. Retrieved from https://www.ijrte.org/download/volume-8-issue-3/. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6725.098319
5. Gilarso, T. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Ekonomi Makro. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
6. Kabanga, A. (2002). Manusia Mati Seutuhnya: Suatu Kajian Antropologi Kristen. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/psiko/article/view/1552
7. Kobong, T. (2008). Injil dan Tongkonan: Inkarnasi, kontekstualisasi, transformasi. Jakarta: Gunung Mulia.
8. Marwing, A. (2011). Problem Psikologis dan Strategi Coping Pelaku Upacara Kematian Rambu solo’ di Tana Toraja (Studi fenomenologi pada tana’ bulaan). Jurnal Psikologi Islam (JPI), Lembaga Penelitian Pengembangan Psikologi Dan Keislaman (LP3K), 8(11), 209. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/psik o/article/view/1552. https://doi.org/10.18860/psi.v0i0.1552
9. McLeish, J. (1969). The Theory of Social Change. Retrieved from https://www.bookdepository.com/Theory-Social-Change-John-McLeish/9780415175203
10. Neuman, W. . (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quatitative Approaches. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279187391_Social_Research_Methods_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Approaches
11. Newton, M., & Huge, C. (2008). The keening of Women and The Roar of the Pipe: From Clarsach to Bagpipe. Ars Lyrica, 17, 75–95. Retrieved from https://sta.rl.talis.com/items/BBF9D275-5B04-F465-A381-B9115D9C4B29.html
12. Nooy-Palm, H. (1986). The Sa’danToraja: A Study of Their Social Life and Religion-Rituals of the East and West. Leiden: KITLV Press, 2. Retrieved from https://brill.com/view/title/23625
13. Panggara, R. (2014). Konflik Kebudayaan Menurut Teori Lewis Alfred Coserdan Relevansinya dalam Upacara Pemakaman (Rambu solo’) di TanaToraja. Jurnal Jaffray, 12(2), 291–316. Retrieved from https://ojs.sttjaf fray.ac.id/index.php/JJV71/article/view/20. https://doi.org/10.25278/JJ.v12i2.020.291-316
14. Ranteallo, I. C. (2007). Pemaknaan Ritual Mantunu dalam Upacara Pemakaman Rambu solo’ di Tana Toraja Sulawesi Selatan. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
15. Sirajuddin, S. N., Baba, S., & Andilolo, D. (2013). Beberapa Motivasi Masyarakat Toraja Memotong Ternak Kerbau Pada Acara Adat (Rambu solo’dan RambuTuka’). Jurnal Ilmu Dan Industri Peternakan, 1(1), 44–45. Retrieved from http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/jiip/article/viewFile/853/823
16. Soekanto, S. (n.d.). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
17. Spadley, J. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
18. Warren, C. (1985). Feasts of Honor: Ritual and Change in the Toraja Highlands. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463400001144
19. Yusriadi, Tahir, Farida, U., Sakkir, G., & Akbar, Z. (2019). Community Perception in the Use of “Songkok Recca” Hats based on Social Stratification. Anthropos: Jurnal Antropologi Sosial Dan Budaya (Journal of Social and Cultural Anthropology), 5(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/antro.v5i1.13165
20. Yusriadi. (2018). Bureaucratic Reform Barriers: A Case Study on the One Stop-Integrated Service Office in Bone Regency. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 22(2),