Main Article Content

Ali Saukah
Nur Mukminatien
Uzlifatul Masruroh Isnawati
Adolf Bastian


Corrective Feedback, L2 Writing, Writing Accuracy, Comprehensive Corrective Feedback (CCF), Selective Corrective Feedback (SCF), Non-grammatical Feedback (NGF)


Purpose of the study: Investigating the effect of corrective feedback on Indonesian students' writing accuracy was the aim of this present study.

Methodology: The methods used were a true experiment with a pretest-treatment-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to address the research questions and a two-way ANOVA to examine.

Main Findings: The data collected was the grammatical accuracy scores from the three groups (comprehensive corrective feedback/CCF, selective corrective feedback/SCF, and non-grammatical feedback/NGF).

Applications of this study: Indonesian EFL students’.

Novelty/Originality of this study: EFL writing teacher is suggested to accommodate the integrated teaching of grammatical features in a communicative context.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 53 | PDF Downloads 47 XML Downloads 0 ePUB Downloads 7


1. Bartholomae, D. (1980). The Study of Error. College Composition and Communication, Vol.31(3): 253-269.
2. Beuningen, C. G. V. (2011). The Effectiveness of Comprehensive Corrective Feedback in Second Language Writing. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
3. Beuningen, C. G. V., Jong, N. H. D., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing. Language Learning, Vol.62(1): 1-41.
4. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2008). The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback. ELT Journal, Vol.63(3): 204-211.
5. Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics, Vol.31(2): 193-214.
6. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.17: 102-118.
7. Corder, S. P. (1967). The Significance of Learner’s Errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Vol.5(4): 161-170.
8. Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constrains, Compensation, and Enhancement. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. (1974). You Can’t Learn without Goofing. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 95-123. London: Longman.
10. Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of Instructed Language Learning. SystemVol.33(2): 209-224.
12. Ellis, R. (2015). The Importance of Focus on Form in Communicative Language Teaching. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol.1(2): 1-12.
13. Ferris, D. & Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice (2nd Ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Khoshsima, H. & Farid, M. J. (2012). The Long-Term Effect of Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback on Accuracy of EFL Learners’ Descriptive Writing Skill. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, Vol.4(2): 119-134.
15. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
16. Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, Theory, and Application. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
17. Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment. Modern Language Journal, Vol.66: 140–149.
18. Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2011). How Languages are learned (3rd Ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on Form: Theory, Research, and Practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology. In K. de Bot, D. Coste, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
21. Long, M. H. (1996). The Role of Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition.In W. C. Ritchie & B. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language Policy and Pedagogy. Essays in Honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179-192). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
23. Mukminatien, N. (1999). The Premature Use of English Grammar by EFL Learners. TEFLIN Journal 10(1): 1-12. Malang: State University of Malang Press
24. Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3): 417-528.
25. Pashazadeh, A & Marefat, H. (2010). The Long-Term Effect of Selective Written Grammar Feedback on EFL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 56: 49-67.
26. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and Memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 631-678). Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2): 129-158.
28. Semke, H. (1984). The Effects of the Red Pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17: 195-202.
29. Sheen, Y. (2007). The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners' Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2): 255-283.
30. Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential Effects of Focused and Unfocused Written Correction on the Accurate Use of Grammatical Forms by Adult ESL Learners System, 37: 556-569.
31. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and Tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-Focused Instruction: Isolated or Integrated?. TESOL Quarterly, 42(2): 181-207.
33. Truscott, J. & Hsu, A. Y. 2008.Error Correction, Revision, and Learning. Journal of Second Language Writing Research, 17: 292-305.
34. Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46(2): 327-369.
35. Truscott, J. (1998). Instance Theory and Universal Grammar in Second Language Research. Second Language Research, 14(3): 257-291.
36. Truscott, J. (1999). The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris. Journal of Second language Writing, 8(2): 111-122.
37. Truscott, J. (2007). The Effect of Error Correction on Learners’ Ability to Write Accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4): 255-272.
38. VanPatten, B. & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit Instruction and Input Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2): 225-244.
39. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.